Abstract

A major conservation challenge in mosaic landscapes is to understand how trait‐specific responses to habitat edges affect bird communities, including potential cascading effects on bird functions providing ecosystem services to forests, such as pest control. Here, we examined how bird species richness, abundance and community composition varied from interior forest habitats and their edges into adjacent open habitats, within a multi‐regional sampling scheme. We further analyzed variations in Conservation Value Index (CVI), Community Specialization Index (CSI) and functional traits across the forest‐edge‐open habitat gradient. Bird species richness, total abundance and CVI were significantly higher at forest edges while CSI peaked at interior open habitats, i.e., furthest from forest edge. In addition, there were important variations in trait‐ and species‐specific responses to forest edges among bird communities. Positive responses to forest edges were found for several forest bird species with unfavorable conservation status. These species were in general insectivores, understorey gleaners, cavity nesters and long‐distance migrants, all traits that displayed higher abundance at forest edges than in forest interiors or adjacent open habitats. Furthermore, consistently with predictions, negative edge effects were recorded in some forest specialist birds and in most open‐habitat birds, showing increasing densities from edges to interior habitats. We thus suggest that increasing landscape‐scale habitat complexity would be beneficial to declining species living in mosaic landscapes combining small woodlands and open habitats. Edge effects between forests and adjacent open habitats may also favor bird functional guilds providing valuable ecosystem services to forests in longstanding fragmented landscapes.

Highlights

  • Forest edges are widespread landscape elements in many European regions, due to a long history of forest fragmentation driven by agricultural and urbanization dynamics

  • The magnitude of edge effects may increase with the contrast between forest edge and adjacent open habitats and with the degree of landscape fragmentation, forest habitat area and cumulative effects of multiple edges (Fletcher 2005; Reino et al 2009)

  • Mean total abundance and species richness were higher at forest edges than in other habitats, including interior forests, in Centre and Midi-Pyrenees but not in Aquitaine where forest edges did not differ from forest interiors (GLMM, edge 9 region effect: z = À0.906; P = 0.365 for abundance and z = À1.592; P = 0.11 for richness)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest edges are widespread landscape elements in many European regions, due to a long history of forest fragmentation driven by agricultural and urbanization dynamics. The magnitude of edge effects may increase with the contrast between forest edge and adjacent open habitats and with the degree of landscape fragmentation, forest habitat area and cumulative effects of multiple edges (Fletcher 2005; Reino et al 2009). Forest edges can have negative effects on open-habitat birds, as demonstrated in eucalypt plantations of Portuguese farmlands (Reino et al 2009). Edges have often been perceived by landscape ecologists or conservation planners as ecological traps, associated with the decline of forest habitat specialists in fragmented landscapes (Ries et al 2004; Fletcher 2005; Laiolo and Rolando 2005)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.