Abstract

Canopy gaps express the time-integrated effects of tree failure and mortality as well as regrowth and succession in tropical forests. Quantifying the size and spatial distribution of canopy gaps is requisite to modeling forest functional processes ranging from carbon fluxes to species interactions and biological diversity. Using high-resolution airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), we mapped and analyzed 5,877,937 static canopy gaps throughout 125,581 ha of lowland Amazonian forest in Peru. Our LiDAR sampling covered a wide range of forest physiognomies across contrasting geologic and topographic conditions, and on depositional floodplain and erosional terra firme substrates. We used the scaling exponent of the Zeta distribution (λ) as a metric to quantify and compare the negative relationship between canopy gap frequency and size across sites. Despite variable canopy height and forest type, values of λ were highly conservative (λ mean = 1.83, s = 0.09), and little variation was observed regionally among geologic substrates and forest types, or at the landscape level comparing depositional-floodplain and erosional terra firme landscapes. λ-values less than 2.0 indicate that these forests are subjected to large gaps that reset carbon stocks when they occur. Consistency of λ-values strongly suggests similarity in the mechanisms of canopy failure across a diverse array of lowland forests in southwestern Amazonia.

Highlights

  • Canopy gaps are openings in forest canopies caused by structural failures ranging in size from individual branch loss to multiple treefalls

  • Block 12 We found that the core study area of block 12 was representative of three regional patterns describing forest structure and size-frequency distributions of canopy gaps

  • There was a much wider range of height values in the depositional floodplain (DFP) compared to the erosional terra firme (ETF), and much taller trees could be found throughout the DFP (Figure 2b,c)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Canopy gaps are openings in forest canopies caused by structural failures ranging in size from individual branch loss to multiple treefalls. The spatial variability of canopy gaps expresses patterns of mortality and physical damage, in addition to subsequent gap filling that occurs via regrowth and secondary succession. Termed static gaps, these openings in the canopy provide insight to the spatial variation in carbon stocks, habitat, and many other forest structural characteristics and functional processes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Quantifying the continuum of disturbance sizes and frequencies between these extremes remains a major challenge, in the context of mapping the geography of forest disturbance regimes [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call