Abstract

Housing development beyond the urban fringe (i.e., exurban development) is one of the fastest growing forms of land-use change in the United States. Exurban development’s attraction to natural and recreational amenities has raised concerns for conservation and represents a potential threat to wildlife. Although forest-dependent species have been found particularly sensitive to low housing densities, it is unclear how the spatial distribution of houses affects forest birds. The aim of this study was to assess forest bird responses to changes in the spatial pattern of exurban development and also to examine species responses when forest loss and forest fragmentation were considered. We evaluated landscape composition around North American Breeding Bird Survey stops between 1986 and 2009 by developing a compactness index to assess changes in the spatial pattern of exurban development over time. Compactness was defined as a measure of how clustered exurban development was in the area surrounding each survey stop at each time period considered. We used Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis to detect the response of forest and forest-edge species in terms of occurrence and relative abundance along the compactness gradient at two spatial scales (400-m and 1-km radius buffer). Our results showed that most forest birds and some forest-edge species were positively associated with high levels of compactness at the larger spatial scale; the proportion of forest in the surrounding landscape also had a significant effect when forest loss and forest fragmentation were accounted for. In contrast, the spatial configuration of exurban development was an important predictor of occurrence and abundance for only a few species at the smaller spatial scale. The positive response of forest birds to compactness at the larger scale could represent a systematic trajectory of decline and could be highly detrimental to bird diversity if exurban growth continues and creates more compacted development.

Highlights

  • As the world’s human population has grown over the last century and residential housing has continued to sprawl even in areas where human population is declining (Pendall, 2003; Seto, Güneralp & Hutyra, 2012), the rapid increase of housing development has expanded at the edge of cities and beyond the urban fringe to increasinglyHow to cite this article Suarez-Rubio and Lookingbill (2016), Forest birds respond to the spatial pattern of exurban development in the Mid-Atlantic region, USA

  • The inclusion here of morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) classes that represented associated roads (i.e., Bridge, Branch, and Loop) in addition to scattered isolated pixels (i.e., Islets) in the definition of exurban development differed from other operational definitions of exurban development used in previous work; as a result, the total amount of development that was classified as exurban was higher for our study than was reported for more restrictive definitions (e.g., Suarez-Rubio, Lookingbill & Elmore, 2012)

  • Our results suggest that both forest birds and some forest-edge species responded to spatial patterns of exurban development at the landscape extent (1-km radius buffer) (Fig. 4B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How to cite this article Suarez-Rubio and Lookingbill (2016), Forest birds respond to the spatial pattern of exurban development in the Mid-Atlantic region, USA. In addition to the loss of vegetation cover, changes in structural complexity around houses in exurban areas may have negative impacts on natural communities (Casey et al, 2009; Odell & Knight, 2001) by degrading habitats and natural resources (Friesen, Eagles & Mackay, 1995; Suarez-Rubio et al, 2013; Theobald, Miller & Hobbs, 1997). Exurban development has been linked to reduced survival and reproduction of some wildlife species (Riley et al, 2003; Tewksbury, Hejl & Martin, 1998) and changes in the behavior and habitat use of other species, for example by interrupting bird migration and movement (Lepczyk, Mertig & Liu, 2004; Miller, Knight & Miller, 1998)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call