Abstract

The amount and spatial distribution of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) were estimated using a range of regionally developed methods using Earth Observation data for Poland, Sweden and regions in Indonesia (Kalimantan), Mexico (Central Mexico and Yucatan peninsula), and South Africa (Eastern provinces) for the year 2010. These regions are representative of numerous forest biomes and biomass levels globally, from South African woodlands and savannas to the humid tropical forest of Kalimantan. AGB retrieval in each region relied on different sources of reference data, including forest inventory plot data and airborne LiDAR observations, and used a range of retrieval algorithms. This is the widest inter-comparison of regional-to-national AGB maps to date in terms of area, forest types, input datasets, and retrieval methods. The accuracy assessment of all regional maps using independent field data or LiDAR AGB maps resulted in an overall root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 10 t ha−1 to 55 t ha−1 (37% to 67% relative RMSE), and an overall bias ranging from −1 t ha−1 to +5 t ha−1 at pixel level. The regional maps showed better agreement with field data than previously developed and widely used pan-tropical or northern hemisphere datasets. The comparison of accuracy assessments showed commonalities in error structures despite the variety of methods, input data, and forest biomes. All regional retrievals resulted in overestimation (up to 63 t ha−1) in the lower AGB classes, and underestimation (up to 85 t ha−1) in the higher AGB classes. Parametric model-based algorithms present advantages due to their low demand on in situ data compared to non-parametric algorithms, but there is a need for datasets and retrieval methods that can overcome the biases at both ends of the AGB range. The outcomes of this study should be considered when developing algorithms to estimate forest biomass at continental to global scale level.

Highlights

  • The histogram of the combined regional maps was comparable to the histogram of aboveground woody biomass (AGB) extracted from the global AGB map of the GEO-CARBON project in the different forest biomes (Olson et al, 2001) covered by this study (Fig. 3)

  • The most substantial differences are on the tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands, and in the montane grasslands and shrublands biomes, where the GEO-CARBON map showed a strongly skewed histogram towards low AGB (< 50 t ha−1) and very low frequency of higher AGB classes, while this study showed a more distributed declining trend from low to high AGB classes in those biomes

  • As the different methods were not compared on the same site, we cannot comment on relative performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantifying forest aboveground woody biomass (AGB), i.e. the amount of woody matter within a forest, has profound social and economic importance, since it is a source of materials and energy for direct human use, and its structure and temporal dynamics exert substantial influence on the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, with direct impacts on biodiversity, as well as on the carbon and energy cycles and the whole Earth system Knowledge of the spatial distribution of forest AGB is typically derived from ground measurements collected by national forest inventories. Vast areas covered by forests mean that ground-based forest inventories need a large amount of resources to provide accurate information on the extent, spatial distribution and dynamics of forest AGB. The only practical approach for consistent global or regional woody biomass estimation lies in systematic use of Earth Observation (EO) data, either in parameterised model-based approaches or in combination with high-quality reference data. Financial mechanisms aiming to reduce emissions and enhance carbon stocks, such as the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative and carbon trading schemes, require credible and consistent measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) systems that are spatially explicit with a wall-to-wall extension and provide a full carbon account of forest ecosystems (Steffen et al, 1998)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call