Abstract
In 2009, the National Academy of Science (NAS) in the United States released a controversial report on the forensic sciences that has stimulated a critical debate on the current status of the forensic sciences internationally. More recently, in the United Kingdom, the Home Office has published a review of research and development in forensic science conducted by Bernard Silverman, the Home Office Chief Scientific Adviser, with support from Andrew Rennison, the Forensic Science Regulator, and Iain Williams, the Head of the Home Office Science Secretariat. This comment will address some of the criticisms and concerns expressed in these reviews, and will suggest where and why some of these concerns are, and are not, relevant to the Australian context. It will provide an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of forensic science policies and practices in Australia with a view to strengthening the field in the future.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.