Abstract

This study identified differences among professionals working in the combined field of psychology and law who hold dual doctorates (DDs) such as J.D./Ph.D. or single doctorates (SDs) consisting of a doctorate in psychology with a master's in law or a doctorate in psychology with forensic specialties. The authors surveyed 52 professionals with the above degree combinations in the United States. The study examined firstly the concern that holders of DDs may lack a professional identity and secondly the belief that they do not contribute scholastically in a unique way. The results showed that holders of DDs reported identifying as both psychologists and lawyers but experienced difficulty marrying the two into a single recognizable professional identity. The participants also reported participating in considerably more varied roles that merged the two fields. These results contrast with the view that holders of DDs polarize or eventually pick one field over time. Possible applications of these findings for professionals and schools are provided.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call