7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189208407769
Copy DOIJournal: The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry | Publication Date: Sep 1, 1992 |
Abstract In this paper possible reasons are given why in the Netherlands the relationship between the magistracy and forensic reporters is one of mutual understanding, rather than of rivalry and competition. By means of case vignettes it will be shown how courts keep in touch with developments in the behavioural sciences. This, however, is not the case with current legislation where conflicts have arisen. An example is where someone has been taken voluntarily into a psychiatric hospital; if the patient is not capable of saying clearly and explicitly that he or she is a voluntary patient, he or she is assumed to be there on an involuntary basis. As a result of such unrealistic legal procedures psychiatry runs the risk of being marginalized by the legislator
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.