Abstract
AbstractFive senior psychiatrists from different forensic psychiatric settings in Sweden were given the task of assessing, independently of each other, material consisting of 40 randomly selected forensic psychiatric reports of non‐psychotic offenders, written previously by other forensic psychiatrists. The results show a remarkable degree of discrepancy in decision making among forensic psychiatrists. Overall, the differences appear to be random, but in some cases there were even negative correlations between assessments made by certain psychiatrists, that is, if one psychiatrist assessed an offender as in need of treatment, another one assessed him as not in need of treatment. Copyright © 1996 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
