Abstract
Forensic Engineers Providing Technical Advisories And Potential Testimony In Cases At Law Are Sometimes Faced With Motions To The Court Designed To Preclude The Consideration Of Their Findings By The Trier Of Fact. Quality Engineering Methods Recognized By The Profession And Supported By Generally Accepted Authority Are Necessary But Not Always Sufficient Components Of An Engineering Effort Capable Of Withstanding Legal Attack. Various Rulings With Case Citations And Results Are Presented For The Purpose Of Demonstrating The Necessity For Forensic Technical Preparation Which Takes Into Account Legal Efforts Aimed At Preventing Presentation Of The Results.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
