Abstract
A privately owned semiconductor test equipment company was sold by its U.S. domestic owners (seller) to a purchaser having an overseas manufacturing location (buyer). The sale was to take place in several stages. The buyer asserted that when the agreement was made he was unaware that the seller’s flagship product was being rejected by customers for not meeting specifications. When this came to light, the buyer refused to continue with the second and subsequent stages of purchase. The seller then sued the buyer for not complyingwith the agreement, and the buyer counter-sued for fraudulent deception. The author was retained by the buyer’s attorney to review specification documents regarding the product, due diligence reports, and e-mail chains regarding product quality, field returns, and repairs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the National Academy of Forensic Engineers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
