Abstract

In 1910, Freud labelled countertransference as pathological, suggesting that analysts either overcome it or quit the profession. It was largely female analysts who, after 40 years of virtual silence on the issue, followed the lead of Paula Heimann and Margaret Little, challenging Freud's anxiety-ridden view and redefining countertransference as an intersubjective mode of relating and a crucial tool of analytic inquiry. This revised view is still questioned by practitioners, many of whom continue to eschew connection and retreat behind Freud's masculine image of the analyst as unemotional and detached. This outmoded analytic ideal hinders contemporary attempts to revise psychoanalysis in feminist terms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.