Abstract
The paper illustrates a discrepancy between the Act of Parliament and the narrative offered by the Australian Tax Office on the changes introduced since July 2009 with reference to Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 – S23AG. This pertains to the Double Tax Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) of which Australia is a signatory. The DTAA with Singapore is taken as an illustrative case. Further, as illustrated in the paper the changes have introduced both social and economic losses to Australia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
