Abstract

As in many other countries, the Japanese government has been keen on both inviting foreign direct investment into the domestic market and protecting against the threat to the public interest that could be caused by foreign ownership. As compared with the discussions in Europe and the US, the arguments in Japan miss the point that the possibility of takeover is an important mechanism to discipline corporate governance of publicly held companies. As a result, the efforts to reconcile the discipline by the market for corporate control with the minimum need to protect the public (national) interest, which have been the core of the arguments on this issue in Europe and the US, were never seriously considered in Japan.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.