Forecasting volatility: A reality check based on option pricing, utility function, value-at-risk, and predictive likelihood

Abstract

We analyze the predictive performance of various volatility models for stock returns. To compare their performance, we choose loss functions for which volatility estimation is of paramount importance. We deal with two economic loss functions (an option pricing function and an utility function) and two statistical loss functions (a goodness-of-fit measure for a value-at-risk (VaR) calculation and a predictive likelihood function). We implement the tests for superior predictive ability of White [Econometrica 68 (5) (2000) 1097] and Hansen [Hansen, P. R. (2001). An unbiased and powerful test for superior predictive ability. Brown University]. We find that, for option pricing, simple models like the Riskmetrics exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) or a simple moving average, which do not require estimation, perform as well as other more sophisticated specifications. For a utility-based loss function, an asymmetric quadratic GARCH seems to dominate, and this result is robust to different degrees of risk aversion. For a VaR-based loss function, a stochastic volatility model is preferred. Interestingly, the Riskmetrics EWMA model, proposed to calculate VaR, seems to be the worst performer. For the predictive likelihood-based loss function, modeling the conditional standard deviation instead of the variance seems to be a dominant modeling strategy.