Abstract

Estimating the bearing capacity of piles is an essential point when seeking for safe and economic geotechnical structures. However, the traditional methods employed in this estimation are time-consuming and costly. The current study aims at elaborating a new alternative model for predicting the pile-bearing capacity based on eleven new advanced machine-learning methods in order to overcome these limitations. The modeling phase used a database of 100 samples collected from different countries. Additionally, eight relevant factors were selected in the input layer based on the literature recommendations. The optimal inputs were modeled using the machine-learning methods and their performance was assessed through six performance measures using a K-fold cross-validation approach. The comparative study proved the effectiveness of the DNN model, which displayed a higher performance in predicting the pile-bearing capacity. This elaborated model provided the optimal prediction, i.e., the closest to the experimental values, compared to the other models and formulae proposed by previous studies. Finally, a reliable and easy-to-use graphical interface was generated, namely “BeaCa2021”. This will be very helpful for researchers and civil engineers when estimating the pile-bearing capacity, with the advantage of saving time and money.

Highlights

  • Pile foundations are used to transmit construction loads deep into the ground in order to ensure structure stability [1,2]

  • The results indicate that the best performance was obtained from the Deep Neural Network (DNN) model trained by the Tan-Sigmoid function

  • The comparison of the results’ assessment between the different proposed models revealed the superiority of the DNN model proposed in our study, which yielded the highest accuracy in terms of mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), index of scattering (IOS), R, R2, and index of agreement (IOA) in both the training/validation phases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pile foundations are used to transmit construction loads deep into the ground in order to ensure structure stability [1,2]. Among the most frequently used methods is the Cone Penetration Test (CPT), known for producing accurate results in a variety of situations [7,8]. This is probably due to the fact that CPT-based methods have been modeled in harmony with the CPT results, which were proven to estimate more effective different geotechnical properties, and make more precise pile capacity predictions [6]. The HSDT is preferable to the SLT, because it operates with a faster, more advanced, and economic technology [2] This quality supports its paramount importance addressed by the American Standards Test

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call