Abstract

Forecasting has been playing an important role in different fields of life, i.e., in decision-making activities of management, to predict uncertain events within an organization, in weather forecasting, in flood forecasting, etc. Stakeholders involved in betting market take advantage of tennis forecasting directly or indirectly. Winning probability calculated using forecasting models helps the bettors in deciding whether to place a bet or not. Keeping in view the importance of tennis forecasting, the Bradley-Terry model is used to model men’s professional tennis for predicting match outcomes in tennis matches of men’s singles. Model coefficients are estimated using data from January 2019 to September 2020 of 3439 matches. Ratings for each player are calculated using model coefficients. Player rankings are then calculated using these ratings. Comparison of model rankings with ATP rankings has shown satisfactory results. Winning probability for each player is calculated using model coefficients and ratings. These probability predictions are evaluated against four measures of performance. The results reveal that surface on which a game is played on contributes significantly towards a player’s performance. Due to this impact of the surface, our model has produced superior player rankings for certain players who had been ranked very low in official ATP rankings. According to most of the performance measures, the model has shown good results for clay court data which are closely followed by hard court data. To calculate return on investment, model results are compared with the bookmakers’ average odds and best available odds. It has been found that return on investment for a fitted model is highest in the case of clay court data in comparison to bookmaker’s average odds and best odds.

Highlights

  • Forecasting has been playing an important role in different fields of life

  • Keeping in view the scope of the current study, it is of great interest to utilize the abilities of players fαig to model a new ranking system as an alternative to official rankings published by ATP and compare both the ranking systems

  • The rankings produced by the model and the ATP rankings are more or less the same for the top 7 players, except a few discrepancies such as Thiem D. and Federer R., whose ATP ranking is 3 and 4, respectively, whereas ranking of these players according to our model is 4 and 3, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forecasting has been playing an important role in different fields of life In recent years, it has got significant importance in sports, i.e., golf, cricket, soccer, and tennis. For making decision in the absence of any objective data, the paired comparison method is a very handy tool. The main reason for applying pairwise comparison methods is simplicity in judging two items instead of several items at once This method can be used in various situations, i.e., in subjective evaluation criteria or when important priorities are unclear, for example, modeling competitive ability in sports and choice behavior, i.e., preference of the democratic presidential candidate to the Republican candidate or the preference of one soft drink to another. The focus of this research is on the player’s ranking to predict match outcomes [20, 21]

Betting Odds and Betting Strategies
Data and Model
Ranking of Tennis Players on All Surfaces
Winning Probabilities on All Surfaces
Ranking of Tennis Players on Hard Court
Winning Probabilities on Hard Court
Ranking of Tennis Players on Clay Court
Winning Probabilities on Clay Court
Measures of Performance
Findings
Closing Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call