Abstract
It is widely believed that U.S. presidential elections represent a referendum on the policies and achievements of the incumbent party. Pioneering studies by Kramer (1971) and Fair (1978, Fair 1982, Fair 1988, Fair 1996) found empirical support for this proposition; specifically, both concluded that more rapid growth of real output produced gains for the party of the incumbent president. Following Kramer and Fair, others have investigated empirical links between election outcomes and economic performance using a variety of techniques, specifications, and data sets. These empirical relationships are often referred to as “vote functions.”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.