Abstract

Forecasting for Social Good has gained considerable attention for its impact on individuals, businesses, and society. This research introduces an integrated hierarchical forecasting-based decision-making approach for mail flow in a major postal organisation, presenting new social performance indicators. These indicators, including the discharge level, discharge rate, and overload rate, guide decision makers toward consistent workload planning, bridging a literature gap concerning forecast utility measures. The study evaluates three forecasting methods—exponential smoothing with error, trend, and seasonality (ETS), the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and the light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM)—in terms of forecast accuracy and social measures, comparing them to the organisation’s current method. The empirical results confirm that the proposed approach is more accurate than the current method. Moreover, while ETS shows the highest forecast accuracy, LightGBM outperforms all methods in social measures. This indicates that a highly accurate forecasting method does not always enhance social performance, challenging traditional views on forecasting evaluation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.