Abstract

AbstractHog producers and first handlers can reduce the risk of unfavorable price fluctuations by combining the information from forecasting models with a selective hedging strategy. Six quarterly price‐forecasting approaches (econometric, ARIMA, expert, naive, and two composites) were evaluated over the 1976–82 period using a simple yet pragmatic hedging decision rule. The results indicate that relatively modest improvements in prices received by producers or paid by first‐handlers relative to cash marketing were possible. Statistically significant reductions in short‐term risk exposure were achieved by both groups through most of the approaches evaluated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.