Abstract

Abstract A forecast intercomparison study using the same six initial states as were used for a study by Baumhefner and Downey (1978) was carried out using the United Kingdom (UK) Meteorological Office operational 10-level model, and two 11-level general circulation models, one a 2° finite-difference model and the other a T42 spectral model. The same diagnostics were produced as by Baumhefner and Downey, including standard deviations, Hoymbder diagrams and error fields. The conclusions show that there are large errors common to all the models, similar to those in Baumhefner and Downey, despite the use of higher resolutions in this experiment. In general, the amplitudes of the transient waves are increased by the higher resolution but phase errors are, not reduced. Errors in the planetary waves also are not reduced. The overall skill scores for these models therefore are no better than those given by Baumhefner and Downey. However, synoptic assessments indicate that there is useful extra detail in these mod...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.