Abstract

Forecast combination is a method that allows the improvement of accuracy of forecasts. The literature presents several studies that assess the methods of forecast combination existent in relation to its accuracy, but there is no unanimity in the results. The combination method by arithmetic mean is the one most widely used, although some authors consider the minimum variance method as more accurate. The latter allows to consider whether or not the correlation between the errors of individual forecasts, a situation in which is attributed, in this study, the nomenclature of simplified method of minimum variance. This study aims at identifying differences in the accuracy of quantitative forecasts, obtained by these methods. The individual modeling that support the combinations are SARIMA and ANN, and measures of accuracy used to choose the best method are MAPE, MSE and MAE. As the main result, there is a superior performance of the simplified combination method by minimum variance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.