Forearm blood flow measurements using computerized R-wave triggered strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography: unilateral vs. bilateral measurements.

Abstract

The human forearm is a well established model to study local vascular reactivity in humans in vivo, using strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography to measure blood flow and changes in blood flow in the forearm. To reduce the intra-individual variability of the forearm blood flow (FBF), it has been advocated that simultaneous measurements of contralateral forearm blood flow is obligatory. Therefore, the use of the calculated forearm ratio (FR) is recommended instead of using the actual FBF. In the present study we compared the intra-individual variability of forearm blood flow measurements and the forearm ratio, by using computerized R-wave triggered strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography, to test if bilateral expression of measurements is better than unilateral. Results were obtained in eight volunteers. Intra-arterial infused sodium nitroprusside induced a dose dependent increase in forearm blood flow and a dose dependent increase in the calculated forearm ratio. Intra-arterial infused norepinephrine induced a dose dependent decrease in forearm blood flow and a dose dependent decrease in the calculated forearm ratio. The differences between the variation coefficients of the forearm blood flow measurements and the calculated forearm ratio were different. These results support our hypothesis that by using a computerized, R-wave triggered system for unilateral forearm blood flow measurement is a more reliable outcome than the calculated forearm ratio derived from bilateral measurements.