Abstract

From 1852 to 1948, the British colonial government developed and relied heavily upon particular land control practices to enact forms of urban planning and population control designed to advance the economic development of Rangoon and maximize revenue for the colonial state. There are three main colonial land control policies with long-standing legacies: the annihilation of pre-conquest property rights, the intentional under-equipping and underservicing of Burman majority or outlying areas, and the use of forced evictions in urban development and city expansion. While these forms of state crime linked to the state organizational goal of land control began in the colonial period, their legacies continue in contemporary Yangon. However, the current social and structural issues in Yangon are not the fault of the British colonial government alone. Subsequent Burmese governments largely continued, borrowed from, or reverted to these state criminal practices at critical junctures to open further space for development, to change the demographic composition of particular areas or simply to control the population. Despite purported ideological differences, successive Burmese regimes have adopted urban planning and housing policies, especially with respect to the urban poor, that vary only slightly from the precedents set by the British colonial administration. Recent actions and pronouncements by the current government suggest that further forced evictions will occur and the National League for Democracy (NLD) will continue to follow colonial precedents in state policies towards forced evictions and the urban poor.

Highlights

  • In Burma,1 the laws and policies underpinning land control, or temporally bound “practices that fix or consolidate forms of access, claiming, and exclusion” (Peluso and Lund 2011: 668), affect areas including housing rights, population density, health and sanitation, taxation, public revenue and human rights

  • This study examines similar economic and political motivations and government practices at work in Yangon over 160 years of state practice

  • Yangon Division Chief Minister Phyo Min Thein has stated that following a registration process, he will relocate all bona fide squatters by 2020 (Moe Myint 2017; San 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Burma, the laws and policies underpinning land control, or temporally bound “practices that fix or consolidate forms of access, claiming, and exclusion” (Peluso and Lund 2011: 668), affect areas including housing rights, population density, health and sanitation, taxation, public revenue and human rights. Similar to Penny Green and Tony Ward’s (2004) argument with respect to state violence (109), I argue that states that have histories of using forced evictions as population and land control measures are likely to continue to view forced evictions as an appropriate means of land control and governance In this way, practices that began in the colonial era and have been labelled as criminal by civil society and/or international law have been adapted and recycled through changing regimes and circumstances.. Yangon Region’s population is projected to increase by 39 per cent between 2015 and 2031 (Republic of the Union of Myanmar 2017), reaching 10 million before 2014 (Scobey-Thal 2013) With this rate of population growth coupled with the inevitable increase in patterns of rural–urban migration through land grabs and development projects in rural areas, scholarly attention needs to pay further heed to the issue of urban land control as a site of contemporary and past state criminal practice linked to dispossession, labour and services

Methodology
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call