Abstract
Global environmental change has motivated multiple interventions in pursuit of sustainable outcomes within tropical forest landscapes. Fire is recognised as a key stressor facing forest conservation efforts. Large‐scale accidental fires are increasingly prevalent across the forested tropics, generating negative impacts across sectors and scales. Policy responses to mega‐fires in the Brazilian Amazon have been diverse but all are dominated by an anti‐fire narrative that highlights long‐stigmatised smallholder agricultural practices. Despite forest conservation initiatives and fire management policies, escaped fire (wildfire) remains pervasive. Forest conservation initiatives are often situated in contexts where swidden agriculture prevails, generating a need for an improved understanding of the interplay between fire management and conservation initiatives on the ground. We explore these dynamics through a case study approach in three leading forest conservation initiative types, situated across diverse contexts in the Brazilian Amazon: a Reduction of Emissions of Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) site (in Middle Solimões region), an extractive reserve (RESEX) (in Arapíuns region), and a Green Municipality Pact (GMP) (in Paragominas). Between sites, climate and colonisation histories vary, yet all demonstrate that farmers experience the burden of escaped fire, attesting to the failure of fire management policies and suggesting that fire (as currently managed) threatens forest conservation goals. Restrictive fire management policies do not replace the necessity of fire‐based agriculture and rather serve to disempower swidden farmers by making burning increasingly illicit. We show that awareness of fire‐free alternatives exists, yet experience is limited and constraints are considerable. We argue that marginalising fire use in the context of forest conservation initiatives contributes to a legacy of failed interventions and jeopardises partnerships between communities and conservation practitioners. Finally, we suggest that given the absence of imminent and viable fire‐free alternatives, particularly in sites where swidden and conservation collide, a new model of fire warrants experimentation.
Highlights
The human population is dependent on ecosystem services which are being degraded at a globally significant scale (Costanza et al, 2014)
Fire policy in the forest conservation initiatives All sites are subject to the regulations specified at the Federal level
According to interviews with conservation managers (GMP) and surveys with smallholder farmers (RESEX), few sanctions for fire escape had been enacted. [insert Table 2 here] Frequency of accidental fires confirms policy failure In all sites, even following policy implementation, damages reported in surveys had accrued from escaped fires demonstrating that neither fire management policies nor forest conservation initiatives are mitigating wildfires (Table 3)
Summary
The human population is dependent on ecosystem services which are being degraded at a globally significant scale (Costanza et al, 2014). Tropical forests are a focal point of dramatic land-use change, much of which has been associated with land clearance through intentional management fires (from small to large scale), which can escape creating uncontrolled ‘wildfires’ (Aragão & Shimabukuro, 2010; Soares-Filho et al, 2012). In response to chronic rates of forest loss and degradation, diverse forest conservation interventions have been implemented across the Brazilian Amazon. These range from the classic protected area model to integrated policy approaches (e.g. the Programme to Control Deforestation in the Amazon, PPCDAM (Portuguese acronym)) that solicit sanctions (e.g. economic boycotts) on deforesting municipalities (Assunção, Gandour, & Rocha, 2015). More recently incentive programs, including Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (and associated co-benefits) (REDD+) aim to induce conservation through conditional rewards (Gebara & Agrawal, 2017)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
