Foraging strategy of cattle in patchy grassland.

Abstract

We tested several strategies of foraging that grazing herbivores may adopt in a patchy habitat in relation to energy intake. The patch selection of cattle was investigated in an Agrostis/Festuca grassland and in a Lolium grassland in 13 observation periods over 2 years. Both grasslands were stocked with five yearling steers. Bite counts were made on patches of different vegetation structure: short, tall and mature stemmy grass. Bite size of each patch category was determined by hand-plucking. Samples of patch types were analysed for organic matter digestibility, as a measure of energy content. There was a large seasonal variation in relative patch cover and in forage characteristics. However, the differences between patches in bite size, bite rate and digestibility were consistent over time. In short patches digestibility was high, bite size was low and bite rate was high compared to stemmy patches. In tall patches digestibility was only little lower than in short patches and bite size and bite rate were intermediate between short and stemmy patches. The steers selected the short and tall patches over the stemmy patches, despite a relatively low intake rate of digestible organic matter in the short patches. Four hypotheses on foraging strategy were examined to explain the allocation of time or bites between patches: random allocation according to bites, random allocation according to grazing time, matching of time in proportion to digestibility, and matching of time in proportion to intake rate of digestible organic matter. The observed distribution of bites and time between patches was significantly different from the predictions of the various hypotheses. Patch choice was better explained by a random allocation of grazing time than by a random allocation of bites. Matching for digestible organic matter intake rate yielded the worst predictions of patch selection. Matching for digestibility gave the best explanation of patch selection, but the improvement compared to a random allocation of grazing time was not significant. The significance of the contribution of digestibility to selection may have been confounded by the effect of increased selectivity within tall patches. Observed patch selection was considered in relation to the maximization of energy intake rate. The selectivity of cattle was not pronounced, but it was consistent with a principle of maximization of energy intake on a daily basis instead of a short-term basis. Selectivity appeared to be constrained by costs of searching for and discriminating between different forage resources. It is concluded that a flexible selection for short patches over tall patches and avoidance of stemmy patches provides a good approximation of energy intake maximization in a complex and changing environment.