Abstract

Summary In Latin America, the common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus is the primary reservoir of rabies, a zoonotic virus that kills thousands of livestock annually and causes sporadic and lethal human rabies outbreaks. The proliferation of livestock provides an abundant food resource for this obligate blood‐feeding species that could alter its foraging behaviour and rabies transmission, but poor understanding of the dietary plasticity of vampire bats limits understanding of how livestock influences rabies risk.We analysed individual‐ and population‐level foraging behaviour by applying δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analysis to hair samples from 183 vampire bats captured from nine colonies in Peru. We also assessed the isotopic distributions of realized prey by analysing blood meals extracted from engorged bats and samples collected from potential prey species. In two adjacent but contrasting areas of the Amazon with scarce and abundant livestock, we used questionnaires to evaluate the incidence of feeding on humans.Population‐level isotopic signatures suggested substantial among‐site variation in feeding behaviour, including reliance on livestock in some colonies and feeding on combinations of domestic and wild prey in others. Isotopic heterogeneity within bat colonies was among the largest recorded in vertebrate populations, indicating that individuals consistently fed on distinct prey resources and across distinct trophic levels. In some sites, isotopic values of realized prey spanned broad ranges, suggesting that bats with intermediate isotopic values could plausibly be dietary specialists rather than generalists.Bayesian estimates of isotopic niche width varied up to ninefold among colonies and were maximized where wildlife and livestock were present at low levels, but declined with greater availability of livestock. In the Amazon, the absence of livestock was associated with feeding on humans and wildlife. Policy implications. We provide the first insights into the foraging behaviour of vampire bats in habitats with common depredation on humans and show how vampire bat foraging may respond to land‐use change. Our results demonstrate risks of rabies transmission from bats to other wildlife and are consistent with the hypothesis that introducing livestock might reduce the burden of human rabies in high‐risk communities.

Highlights

  • Land-use changes such as urbanization and agricultural intensification alter the dietary resources available toThe common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus, an obligate blood-feeding species, has experienced changing availability of wild and domestic prey throughout its range from Mexico to northern Argentina

  • We analysed individual- and population-level foraging behaviour by applying d13C and d15N stable isotope analysis to hair samples from 183 vampire bats captured from nine colonies in Peru

  • Our results demonstrate risks of rabies transmission from bats to other wildlife and are consistent with the hypothesis that introducing livestock might reduce the burden of human rabies in high-risk communities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Land-use changes such as urbanization and agricultural intensification alter the dietary resources available toThe common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus, an obligate blood-feeding species, has experienced changing availability of wild and domestic prey throughout its range from Mexico to northern Argentina. Intensification of livestock rearing has created a novel, abundant and reliable source of blood that has caused population growth and geographic range expansions (Delpietro, Marchevsky & Simonetti 1992; Lee, Papes & Van Den Bussche 2012). These changes have direct implications for human and animal health because D. rotundus is the most important reservoir of Rabies virus in Latin America – a lethal zoonotic disease that kills thousands of livestock annually and causes recurrent human rabies outbreaks in the Amazon rain forest (Schneider et al 2009). Will introduction of livestock to forested areas reduce vampire bat depredation on wildlife and humans? As local removal of livestock has been associated with greater depredation on humans (McCarthy 1989), we hypothesize that bat bites on humans could decline when livestock are introduced

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call