Abstract

Simple SummarySocial information use is a widespread phenomenon in animals affecting various important aspects of behavior. Animals observe and copy the behavioral patterns of conspecifics and other species on the same trophic level in their own decision-making. Copying others is adaptive only when it is selective, otherwise running the risk of copying bad behavior. Thus, it would be important to know when and which individuals should be copied. We showed that bumblebees Bombus terrestris learn to attend to specific types of bees based on their learned value as information-providers about reward. Learned information was transferred across foraging contexts, representing a useful pathway for bees to acquire relevant information about unfamiliar floral resources that goes beyond conspecific social information use, extending to heterospecifics. Our findings indicate that the transmission of social information across species can be highly selective in response to learned value of the information provider, plausibly making the phenomenon adaptive.Using social information can be an efficient strategy for learning in a new environment while reducing the risks associated with trial-and-error learning. Whereas social information from conspecifics has long been assumed to be preferentially attended by animals, heterospecifics can also provide relevant information. Because different species may vary in their informative value, using heterospecific social information indiscriminately can be ineffective and even detrimental. Here, we evaluated how selective use of social information might arise at a proximate level in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) as a result of experience with demonstrators differing in their visual appearance and in their informative value as reward predictors. Bumblebees were first trained to discriminate rewarding from unrewarding flowers based on which type of “heterospecific” (one of two differently painted model bees) was next to each flower. Subsequently, these bumblebees were exposed to a novel foraging context with two live painted bees. In this novel context, observer bumblebees showed significantly more social information-seeking behavior towards the type of bees that had predicted reward during training. Bumblebees were not attracted by paint-marked small wooden balls (moved via magnets) or paint-marked non-pollinating heterospecifics (woodlice; Porcellio laevis) in the novel context, indicating that bees did not simply respond to conditioned color cues nor to irrelevant social cues, but rather had a “search image” of what previously constituted a valuable, versus invaluable, information provider. The behavior of our bumblebees suggests that their use of social information is governed by learning, is selective, and extends beyond conspecifics.

Highlights

  • Animals can gather information about their environment through personal exploration or by learning from others through observation [1]

  • The DEMONSTRATOR TYPE DISCRIMINATION MODEL shows that observer bumblebees had significantly less proximity instances with balls (4 out of 20 bees, Generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs) (Proximity instances); estimate −2.42, SE = 0.75, t = −3.24, p = 0.001) or woodlice

  • Our results confirm that bumblebees can discriminate between different types of artificiallyOur results confirm that bumblebees can discriminate between different types of artificiallymodified model bumblebees via learned associations between distinctive visual cues, characterizing modified model bumblebees via learned associations between distinctive visual cues, characterizing such models and the models’ relative informative value to predict reward

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals can gather information about their environment through personal exploration or by learning from others through observation [1]. Animals are expected to use social information in a selective manner [5,8,9,10]. On evolutionary and adaptive grounds, animals are expected to recognize and favor social information from conspecific over heterospecific sources [25,26], but in most natural communities, heterospecifics are a prolific source of social cues that may provide relevant information [5,27,28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.