Foraging behaviour of Lesser Sheathbills Chionis minor exploiting invertebrates on a sub-Antarctic island.

Abstract

During winter (May through October) many Lesser Sheathbills Chionis minor at Marion Island in the sub-Antarctic were obliged to leave their preferred foraging habitat in penguin colonies to forage for invertebrates on the island's coastal plain. The study describes factors affecting feeding success, time budgets and predation risk of the sheathbills which exploited these small, patchily dispersed prey. The birds appeared to select prey ≧1 mm in diameter, and ignore smaller, common invertebrates.Sheathbills were highly selective of foraging habitat. During 17 censuses made through the winter, 97% of the 1,504 birdsightings were at only eight of the 19 available vegetation types. Multiple regression analysis revealed that prey density was the most important criterion in habitat preference, followed by plant canopy height and distance of the habitat from the sea. These variables accounted for 78% of the variance of habitat use. Focal-animal observations in a sample of habitats showed that feeding success was correlated with prey density and distance from the sea. Tall vegetation impeded the locomotion and foraging of sheathbills. The sheathbills reduced predation risk from skuas Catharacta lonnbergi and travelling time by foraging near the shore. The spatial distribution of prey within vegetation types was apparently unimportant in habitat selection.During winter 83% of the sheathbills in the study foraged communally and 98% roosted communally. Flocks occurred only on good quality habitat and flocking probably facilitated habitat selection. Feeding success increased initially with increasing flock size but decreased in flocks greater than 15 birds, which was attributed to localized prey deletions. The sheathbills spent 88% of the daytime foraging; and feeding, looking around and walking comprised 99% of foraging time. Feeding time increased with increasing flock size, looking around decreased but walking was unaffected. Aggression was rare, was unaffected by flock size and did not significantly affect feeding. A probability model showed that sheathbills could greatly reduce predation risk by flocking but the benefits would not improve much in flocks greater than eight birds.The habitat selection, time budgets and feeding success of adults, subadults and juveniles were very similar.The exploitation of terrestrial invertebrates by sheathbills was interpreted as an expansion of the population's trophic niche to tap an underexploited resource on a species-poor island.