Abstract

The migration strategy of many capital breeders is to garner body stores along the flyway at distinct stopover sites. The rate at which they can fuel is likely to be strongly influenced by a range of factors, such as physiology, food availability, time available for foraging and perceived predation. We analysed the foraging behaviour and fuel accumulation of pink‐footed geese, an Arctic capital breeder, at their mid‐flyway spring stopover site and evaluated to what extent their behaviour and fuelling were related to physiological and external factors and how it differed from other stopovers along the flyway. We found that fuel accumulation rates of geese at the mid‐flyway site were limited by habitat availability rather than by digestive constraints. However, as the time available for foraging increased over the stopover season, geese were able to keep constant fuelling rate. Putting this in perspective, geese increased their daily net energy intake along the flyway corresponding to the increase in time available for foraging. The net energy intake per hour of foraging remained the same. Geese showed differences in their reaction to predators/disturbance between the sites, taking higher risks particularly at the final stopover site. Hence, perceived predation along the flyway may force birds to postpone the final fuel accumulation to the last stopover along the flyway. Flexibility in behaviour appears to be an important trait to ensure fitness in this capital breeder. Our findings are based on a new, improved method for estimating fuel accumulation of animals foraging in heterogeneous landscapes based on data obtained from satellite telemetry and habitat specific intake rates.

Highlights

  • Because some animals use stored fat and protein as an important energy source during their migration and breeding, studying their foraging behaviour and fuel accumulation is necessary in order to understand their migratory behaviour (Sapir et al 2011)

  • Capital breeders migrating in steps face a number of decisions on their journey, such as how long to stay and how much fuel to accumulate at each site

  • The results suggest that the fuelling rate of geese and especially metabolisable energy intake rate in mid-Norway can be limited by digestive constraints

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because some animals use stored fat and protein as an important energy source during their migration and breeding, studying their foraging behaviour and fuel accumulation is necessary in order to understand their migratory behaviour (Sapir et al 2011). Foraging behaviour and fuel accumulation of animals can be influenced by physiological factors such as capacity of alimentary tract (as shown to be the case for shrews Sorex sp.: Saarikko and Hanski 1990, brent geese Branta bernicla: Prop and Deerenberg 1991, Bewick’s swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii: van Gils et al 2008) Such digestive constraints may force animals to stop feeding in order to allow the ingested food to pass through the alimentary tract before new food can be ingested (Owen 1972, Saarikko and Hanski 1990, Prop and Vulink 1992, Kersten and Visser 1996). We generally expect higher fuelling rates if the availability of highly energetic food increases (as shown for fallow deer Dama dama: Focardi et al 1996, barnacle geese Branta leucopsis: Black et al 2014 and pink-footed geese: Chudzińska et al 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call