Foraging behavior of a mesopelagic predator, the northern elephant seal, in northeastern Pacific eddies

Abstract

The role of mesoscale features in structuring trophic transfer in the mesopelagic zone is poorly understood. Deploying sensors on marine animals, or “biologging,” is a powerful tool to infer the organism's behavior and simultaneously collect high-resolution oceanographic data to describe physical-biological interactions. We investigated whether mesoscale eddies are used by a mesopelagic predator, the northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris), and if so, what mechanisms might create beneficial foraging conditions in association with eddies. We hypothesized seals would increase their foraging behavior in both cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies due to nutrient enhancement and physical aggregation of prey and that seals would dive deeper in anticyclonic eddies in response to a deeper prey field. We used tracking data and continuous in situ temperature measurements from 221 adult female northern elephant seals collected between 2004 and 2019. These predators primarily targeted myctophid fishes and squid throughout the northeast Pacific mesopelagic zone, foraging between approximately 400–800 m. Eddy encounters were identified using remotely sensed sea level anomaly data and confirmed visually with collocated sea level anomaly, in situ temperature, and in situ temperature anomaly. Over more than 30,000 days of data and >3 million temperature casts collected by seals, we found 129 high confidence encounters with anticyclonic eddies and 83 with cyclonic eddies. Overall, seals traveled more slowly and in a less directed manner while associated with eddies, particularly anticyclonic eddies, suggesting increased foraging behavior, especially in the California Current. Elephant seals spent more time at the edges of cyclonic eddies than their center. In contrast, they utilized both the interior and edge of anticyclonic eddies. This suggests that the aggregation of prey at the frontal region of an eddy is an important mechanism, whereas nutrient upwelling associated with an eddy play a more minor role in enhancing the seals' prey field. Seal foraging behavior was not influenced by eddy age, size, amplitude, or rotational speed. The large sample size in this study showed considerable variation between individual behavioral responses, suggesting caution when extrapolating individual behavior to a population level. Our data show that both cyclonic and anticyclonic eddies can affect the seals' prey field as demonstrated by enhanced foraging behavior. Still, the variation in behavioral responses resulting from individual foraging strategies, eddy histories, and possible spatiotemporal mismatches between eddy physics and biological responses relevant to mesopelagic predators merit further investigation.