For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation prior to carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary: the argument against.

Abstract

HomeStrokeVol. 34, No. 7For Severe Carotid Stenosis Found on Ultrasound, Further Arterial Evaluation Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy Is Unnecessary: The Argument Against Free AccessArticle CommentaryPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessArticle CommentaryPDF/EPUBFor Severe Carotid Stenosis Found on Ultrasound, Further Arterial Evaluation Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy Is Unnecessary: The Argument Against Peter M. Rothwell, MD, PhD, FRCP Peter M. RothwellPeter M. Rothwell From the Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK. Search for more papers by this author Originally published26 Jun 2003https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000079176.04043.09Stroke. 2003;34:1817–1819Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: June 26, 2003: Previous Version 1 Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in certain patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis1 and to a lesser extent inpatients with severe asymptomatic stenosis.2 Screening of patients for inclusion in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was usually performed with Doppler ultrasound (DU), but conventional arterial angiography (CAA) was required prior to randomization in the RCTs in symptomatic stenosis1 and prior to surgery in ACAS.2 However, CAA is costly, time-consuming, and can cause stroke. A systematic review of prospective studies of the risks of CAA inpatients with cerebrovascular disease reported a 0.1% risk of death and a 1.0% risk of permanent neurological sequelae.3 More recent studies have reported lower risks in both academic centers and community hospitals,4 but many centers have already adopted a policy of operating on the basis of DU alone.5What Are the Advantages of Doppler Ultrasound?The main advantage of DU over CAA is the absence of a procedural risk. However, it should be noted that most studies of the risk of CAA classified all strokes that occurred within 24 hours of CAA as procedural complications. Given that the risk of stroke shortly after presentation with symptomatic carotid stenosis and prior to endarterectomy is about 0.5% per day, 6 the excess stroke risk due to CAA in recently symptomatic patients is probably only about 0.5%.Has Practice With Ultrasound Alone Been Shown to Be Adequate?In contrast to pharmaceutical products, new diagnostic or imaging strategies are not subject to regulatory control, and no standards are set for validation. Given that the available techniques of carotid imaging use completely different source data to estimate stenosis, and that there is major variation in carotid bifurcation anatomy between individuals7 and between the sexes,8 translation of measurements of stenosis from one technique to another is not straightforward. Although several hundred studies of carotid imaging have been published over the past 2 decades, the majority are undermined by poor design, inadequate sample size,9 and inappropriate analysis and presentation of data.10 However, a meta-analysis of methodologically sound studies of noninvasive carotid imaging published prior to 1995 concluded that DU could not substitute for CAA as the sole pre-endarterectomy imaging because of the frequency with which the degree of stenosis was misclassified.11 More recent studies have confirmed this.12Does Misclassification of the Degree of Carotid Stenosis Matter?Benefit from endarterectomy is highly dependent on the degree of symptomatic carotid stenosis as measured on CAA.1 Misclassification of stenosis with DU will lead to some patients being operated on unnecessarily and others being denied appropriate surgery. This harm must be balanced against the 0.5% excess risk of stroke associated with CAA, ie, 1 additional stroke per 200 patients. For example, given the 33.8% reduction in the 8-year absolute risk of stroke with endarterectomy in patients with 90% to 99% symptomatic stenosis,1 for every 3 patients who are not operated on, possibly because a complete occlusion is seen with DU, 1 stroke will go unprevented. A rate of misclassification of 90% to 99% stenosis as complete occlusion of only 1.5% would therefore be sufficient to offset the risk of CAA. Similarly, given the 15.1% reduction in the 8-year risk of stroke with endarterectomy in patients with 60% to 69% symptomatic stenosis,1 misclassification of 10% of such patients as <50% stenosis with DU would offset the risk of CAA. In practice, misclassification rates can be much higher.11,12 A recent comparison of CAA with DU in 569 consecutive patients in “accredited” laboratories with experienced radiologists found that 28% of decisions about endarterectomy based on DU alone were inappropriate.12 The reliability of DU varies significantly between laboratories,13 and misclassification in nonaccredited laboratories is likely to be even greater.What Other Useful Information Is Lost With Use of Doppler Ultrasound Alone?Plaque surface ulceration on CAA indicates a particularly high risk of stroke on medical treatment,14 increased benefit from endarterectomy,15 and identifies patients at high risk of coronary vascular events.16 Currently available DU techniques do not provide reliable data on plaque surface morphology.17 In contrast, the risk of stroke on medical treatment is low in patients with poststenotic narrowing of the internal carotid artery or “near-occlusions,” and this group derives little benefit from surgery.1 There are few data on the reliability of DU at detecting near-occlusions. Other angiographic characteristics, including the presence of distal disease and collateral circulation to the symptomatic hemisphere, also influence the risks and benefits of endarterectomy.18,19 DU may provide some of this information, but the assessments that are required are far from routine.Is the Combination of Doppler Ultrasound With Other Noninvasive Techniques Adequate?Given the major shortcomings of DU alone in selection of patients for endarterectomy, the combination of DU with other noninvasive methods of imaging, usually magnetic resonance angiography (MRA),12,20 has been studied. The rate of inappropriate decisions in comparison with CAA is reduced to <10% in patients in whom the results of DU and MRA are concordant.12 MRA provides useful information about tandem lesions and distal disease, but contrast-enhanced MRA does not appear to offer any additional benefit.20 CAA is still required in the 25% of patients in whom DU and MRA do not produce concordant results.ConclusionsEven very low rates of misclassification of symptomatic patients as appropriate or inappropriate for surgery, by DU or other noninvasive methods of imaging used in isolation, will nullify any gain that is obtained by avoiding the risk of CAA. Although CAA is far from ideal, the accurate determination of degree of stenosis and demonstration of other clinically useful information mean that it remains the “gold standard” imaging method for selection of symptomatic patients for endarterectomy, provided that it can be performed without significant delay to surgery. Whether the very small benefits of endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis justify the use of CAA is less certain. Further studies of the combination of DU and MRA are required.The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Stroke Association.FootnotesCorrespondence to Dr P.M. Rothwell, Radcliffe Infirmary, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM, for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. Pooled analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003; 361: 107–116.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS). Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 273: 1421–1428.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographic risk in patients with mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1990; 21: 209–222.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Johnston DC, Chapman KM, Goldstein LB. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology. 2001; 57: 2012–2014.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Dawson DL, Roseberry CA, Fujitana RM. Preoperative testing before carotid endarterectomy: a survey of vascular surgeons’ attitudes. Ann Vasc Surg. 1977; 11: 264–272.Google Scholar6 Blaser T, Hofmann K, Buerger T, Effenberger O, Wallesch C, Goertler M. Risk of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and vessel occlusion before endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1057–1062.LinkGoogle Scholar7 Schulz UGR, Rothwell PM. Major variation in carotid bifurcation anatomy: a possible risk factor for plaque development? Stroke. 2001; 32: 2522–2529.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Schulz UGR, Rothwell PM. Sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy and the distribution of atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke. 2001; 32: 1525–1531.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Rothwell PM, Pendlebury ST, Wardlaw J, Warlow CP. Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of the imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1444–1450.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Rothwell PM. Analysis of agreement between measurements of continuous variables: general principles and lessons from studies of the imaging of carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000; 415: 825–834.Google Scholar11 Blakeley DD, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V, Simel DL, Matchar DB. Noninvasive carotid artery testing. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122: 360–365.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Johnston DC, Goldstein LB. Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus cerebral angiography. Neurology. 2001; 56: 1009–1015.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Howard G, Chambless LE, Baker WH, et al. A multicenter validation study of Doppler ultrasound versus angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1991; 1: 166–73.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. The interrelation between plaque surface morphology, degree of stenosis and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000; 31: 615–621.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 Rothwell PM, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM, for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic stenosis, III: the efficacy of surgery in important predefined subgroups. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; (suppl 2): 108.Abstract.Google Scholar16 Rothwell PM, Villagra R, Gibson R, Donders R, Warlow CP. Evidence of a chronic systemic cause of instability of atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet. 2000; 355: 19–24.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Arnold JAC, Modaresi KB, Thomas N, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS. Carotid plaque characterization by duplex scanning: observer error may undermine current clinical trials. Stroke. 1999; 30: 61–65.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Kappelle LJ, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, Barnett HJM, for the NASCET trial. Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke. 1999; 30: 282–286.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Henderson RD, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Rothwell PM, Barnett HJM, for the NASCET trial. Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 2000; 31: 128–132.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Johnston DCC, Eastwood JD, Nguyen T, Goldstein LB. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2834–2838.LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By AbuRahma A (2022) Overview of Cerebrovascular Disease Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis, 10.1007/978-3-030-60626-8_6, (103-139), . AbuRahma A (2021) Overview of Cerebrovascular Disease Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis, 10.1007/978-3-030-49616-6_6-1, (1-37), . Tamhankar M (2019) Transient Visual Loss or Blurring Liu, Volpe, and Galetta's Neuro-Ophthalmology, 10.1016/B978-0-323-34044-1.00010-9, (365-377), . AbuRahma A (2017) Overview of Cerebrovascular Disease Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis, 10.1007/978-3-319-54760-2_6, (61-86), . AbuRahma A (2013) Overview of Cerebrovascular Disease Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis, 10.1007/978-1-4471-4005-4_6, (57-78), . AbuRahma A (2010) Overview of Various Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Techniques Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Diagnosis, 10.1007/978-1-84882-957-2_2, (19-28), . Habibi R, Lell M, Steiner R, Ruehm S, Sayre J, Nael K and Finn J (2008) High-Resolution 3T MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Quantification of Stenosis, American Journal of Neuroradiology, 10.3174/ajnr.A1302, 30:1, (46-52), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009. Chmayssani M and Festa J (2009) Carotid Artery Occlusion and Stenosis Neurovascular Neuropsychology, 10.1007/978-0-387-70715-0_9, (115-133), . Korteweg M, Kerkhoff H, Bakker J and Elgersma O (2008) Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital, Clinical Radiology, 10.1016/j.crad.2007.08.001, 63:2, (174-183), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008. Wardlaw J (2008) Carotid Imaging for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Routine Practice, International Journal of Stroke, 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00176.x, 3:1, (20-32), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008. Allan P and Gallagher K (2008) Las arterias carótidas y vertebrales; Doppler color transcraneal Ecografía Doppler clínica, 10.1016/B978-84-8086-328-5.50003-4, (41-72), . KATANO H, TANIKAWA M, AIHARA N, UMEMURA A, MASE M and YAMADA K (2007) Postoperative Follow up for Carotid Stenosis with 3D-CT Angiography after CEA/CAS, Surgery for Cerebral Stroke, 10.2335/scs.35.382, 35:5, (382-386), . Katano H and Yamada K Imaging After Surgical Thrombendarterectomy of the Carotid Artery Imaging of Carotid Artery Stenosis, 10.1007/978-3-211-32509-4_15, (239-246) AbuRahma A Overview of Various Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Techniques Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis, 10.1007/978-1-84628-450-2_5, (50-59) White C (2007) Carotid Artery Intervention Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1007/978-1-84628-715-2_84, (1741-1753), . Cuffe R and Rothwell P (2006) Effect of Nonoptimal Imaging on the Relationship Between the Measured Degree of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Ischemic Stroke, Stroke, 37:7, (1785-1791), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2006. Allan P and Gallagher K (2006) The carotid and vertebral arteries; Transcranial colour Doppler Clinical Doppler Ultrasound, 10.1016/B978-0-443-10116-8.50007-5, (41-72), . Netuka D, Beneš V, Mandys V, Hlásenská J, Burkert J and Beneš V (2006) Accuracy of angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of carotid stenosis: a histopathological study of 123 cases, Acta Neurochirurgica, 10.1007/s00701-006-0756-y, 148:5, (511-520), Online publication date: 1-May-2006. Levy E, Ecker R, Thompson J, Rosella P, Hanel R, Guterman L and Hopkins L Toward clinical equipoise: the current case for carotid angioplasty and stent placement, Neurosurgical Focus, 10.3171/foc.2005.18.1.4, 18:1, (1-8) Romero J, Ackerman R, Dault N and Lev M (2005) Noninvasive Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Indications, Strategies, and Accuracy, Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 10.1016/j.nic.2005.06.005, 15:2, (351-365), Online publication date: 1-May-2005. Norris J and Halliday A (2004) Is Ultrasound Sufficient for Vascular Imaging Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy?, Stroke, 35:2, (370-371), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2004. Brook A, Mirsky D and Bello J (2004) Stroke Prevention: Carotid Intervention Based on Catheter Angiography versus Noninvasive Vascular Imaging, Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 10.1053/j.tvir.2005.02.008, 7:4, (196-201), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004. Morgan J, Ackerman R, Romero J and Lev M (2004) Noninvasive imaging evaluation of carotid artery occlusive disease, Applied Radiology, 10.37549/AR1272, (16-24) July 2003Vol 34, Issue 7 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000079176.04043.09PMID: 12829870 Originally publishedJune 26, 2003 Keywordsmagnetic resonance angiographyultrasonography, Doppler, transcranialcarotid stenosiscarotid endarterectomyPDF download Advertisement