Abstract

Aims/Hypothesis: To study the effects of cereulide, a food toxin often found at low concentrations in take-away meals, on beta-cell survival and function. Methods: Cell death was quantified by Hoechst/Propidium Iodide in mouse (MIN6) and rat (INS-1E) beta-cell lines, whole mouse islets and control cell lines (HepG2 and COS-1). Beta-cell function was studied by glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Mechanisms of toxicity were evaluated in MIN6 cells by mRNA profiling, electron microscopy and mitochondrial function tests. Results: 24 h exposure to 5 ng/ml cereulide rendered almost all MIN6, INS-1E and pancreatic islets apoptotic, whereas cell death did not increase in the control cell lines. In MIN6 cells and murine islets, GSIS capacity was lost following 24 h exposure to 0.5 ng/ml cereulide (P,0.05). Cereulide exposure induced markers of mitochondrial stress including Puma (p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis, P,0.05) and general pro-apoptotic signals as Chop (CCAAT/-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein). Mitochondria appeared swollen upon transmission electron microscopy, basal respiration rate was reduced by 52% (P,0.05) and reactive oxygen species increased by more than twofold (P,0.05) following 24 h exposure to 0.25 and 0.50 ng/ml cereulide, respectively. Conclusions/Interpretation: Cereulide causes apoptotic beta-cell death at low concentrations and impairs beta-cell function at even lower concentrations, with mitochondrial dysfunction underlying these defects. Thus, exposure to cereulide even at concentrations too low to cause systemic effects appears deleterious to the beta-cell.

Highlights

  • Background Environmental factors play a major role in the rising prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • a lipophilic peptide that is often found at low concentrations in starchy food

  • a culprit to consider in this era of prepackaged meals

Read more

Summary

Foodborne cereulide causes beta cell dysfunction and apoptosis

Roman Vangoitsenhoven1*, Dieter Rondas[1], Inne Crèvecoeur[1], Wannes D’Hertog[1], Matilde Masini[2], Mirjana Andjelkovic[3], Joris Van Loco[3], Christophe Matthys[1], Chantal Mathieu[1], Lut Overbergh[1], Bart Van der Schueren[1]. From Genes and nutrition, is personalised nutrition the realistic step? From Genes and nutrition, is personalised nutrition the realistic step? Brussels, Belgium. 25 April 2014

Background
Materials and methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.