Abstract

In this study, the microbiological food safety of using anaerobic digestate as a fertilizer in hydroponic production of vegetables was evaluated. The used anaerobic digestate was a liquid residue obtained from the digestion of food waste in the production of biogas. Replacing the customary inorganic fertilizer used in hydroponic production with this recycled fertilizer (biofertilizer) could allow for sustainable urban food production close to retailers and consumers. However, in striving for circular food production, it is vital that the food safety of utilizing recycled resources is ensured. Especially in the application of hydroponic farming, where the nutrient loop is shorter than on arable land, a microbiological food safety risk assessment is crucial when adopting new and recycled fertilizers. The biofertilizer based on anaerobic digestate was therefore studied with regard to its microbial community (16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) during production of vegetables in a hydroponic system. The biofertilizer was also challenge tested with food borne pathogens (Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus). Furthermore, the microbial activity of the biofertilizer was studied using isothermal calorimetry. The results showed that the microbial community of the biofertilizer changed distinctly through a necessary initial nitrification process, and that the most abundant genus was Mycobacterium. Deliberate contaminations with 5 log10 CFU mL−1 of either S. enterica or L. monocytogenes in the nitrified biofertilizer were no longer detectable with selective plating after 48 h of incubation at 20 °C. Selective plating for B. cereus revealed that the biofertilizer contained low levels (∼10 CFU mL−1) of the bacterium, and an inoculation of 5 log10 CFU mL−1B. cereus decreased to these levels within 24 h of incubation at 20 °C. Analysis of the microbial activity of the biofertilizer indicated that the biofertilizer does not seem to support microbial activity without the addition of an external nutrient source that contains an accessible carbon source and trace elements. The type of biofertilizer investigated in this study is thus regarded as microbiologically safe for use in hydroponic cultivation. The constant presence of viable B. cereus, however, emphasizes the fundamental importance of continuous risk assessment in case of any modifications or supplementations of the biofertilizer, since it clearly can act as a reservoir for bacterial endospores.

Highlights

  • The societal and political interest in more sustainable and circular food production systems is increasing and in parallel to this develop­ ment, the focus in waste treatment is being directed towards increased resource recovery

  • To assess the microbiological food safety of using anaerobic digestate as a biofertilizer in hydroponic vegetable production, the nitrified bio­ fertilizer was investigated from three perspectives; (1) the activity and viability of the natural microflora present in the nitrified biofertilizer was assessed with viable count (VC), flow cytometry (FC) and isothermal calorimetry (IC), (2) the susceptibility of the biofertilizer for food-borne pathogens S. enterica, L. monocytogenes and B. cereus to grow and establish themselves was investigated with challenge testing, and (3) the microbial community of the non-nitrified and nitrified bio­ fertilizer, as well mineral fertilizer, was analysed with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing

  • Based on microbial activity studies, challenge tests and microbial community analysis, this study has generated insights important for the food safety risk assessment of a biofertilizer used for food production in a hydroponic cultivation system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The societal and political interest in more sustainable and circular food production systems is increasing and in parallel to this develop­ ment, the focus in waste treatment is being directed towards increased resource recovery. It is imperative to reduce food loss to increase food security, this is complex as losses occur in the whole produc­ tion and supply chain. Food waste from household consumption con­ tributes largely to food loss as demonstrated in the study of Garcia-Herrero et al (2018). Besides measures for reducing production of food waste, methods for its valorisation is important. Urban farming is an example of alternative food production systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call