Abstract
By comparing US, Canadian, and EC regulatory regimes, this paper examines the impact of each government’s regulatory administrative structures on GMO trade policies. Although the Office of the United States Trade Representative, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, and Europe’s Directorate-General For Trade have primary responsibility for developing and implementing trade policies, the scope of this paper is limited to exploring the respective regulatory regimes. This introductory section of the paper discusses the background and history of GMOs along with the health and safety concerns raised by the introduction of GMOs into the environment. The following three sections present an overview of the regulatory regimes in the US, Canada, and the EC respectively. Section V then discusses the relevant WTO disputes involving the US, Canada, and the EC. A comparative analysis of the regulatory regimes in the context of the trade disputes is presented in Section VI. Section VII concludes the paper with a discussion of risk and recommendation that substantial equivalence doctrine expand to include novel processes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.