Abstract

Aim of study: To evaluate if dietary restriction influence muscle and intestinal morphology as well as the production performance of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).Area of study: State University of Western Paraná (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná – Unioeste), Toledo Campus, Brazil.Material and methods: The experimental design was completely randomized with four treatments and five replicates. The treatments were: 7:0 (fed daily; control); 6:1 (fed 6 consecutive days followed by 1 day of fasting); 5:2 (fed 5 consecutive days followed by 2 days of fasting); and 1:1 (fed 1 day followed by 1 day of fasting). A commercial ration with 33.70% crude protein and 4.60% lipid was used, and fish were fed four times daily until apparent satiety for 60 days.Main results: The following parameters were found to have differences among treatments (p<0.05): final weight, weight gain, final length, hepatosomatic index, visceral fat, intestinal quotient, protein efficiency rate, protein retention, ash, and frequency of muscle fiber diameters within the classes of<20 μm and between 20 and 50 μm. The intestinal villi height and hepatic glycogen content did not differ (p>0.05) among treatments. The cost of food and partial net revenue were higher in the 7:0 treatment compared to the experimental treatments.Research highlights: Dietary restriction for Nile tilapia in the juvenile phase negatively influences productive performance, centesimal composition, and muscle growth, which demonstrates that this practice is economically unfeasible for commercial production.

Highlights

  • The Brazilian territory is endowed with a wide coastal area and abundant aquatic natural resources

  • The treatments consisted of 7:0 - fed daily; 6:1 - fed six consecutive days followed by one day of food restriction; 5:2 - fed five consecutive days followed by two days of food restriction; and 1:1 - fed one day followed by one day of food restriction

  • Fish fed daily (7:0) presented significantly higher (p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Brazilian territory is endowed with a wide coastal area and abundant aquatic natural resources. Food restriction strategies may be an alternative to reduce food costs in fish production; in detriment to deprivation, physiological changes in fish vary and may be influenced by factors such as climatic seasonality during cultivation, water quality parameters, the species’ stage of development, and nutritional “status”. These possible physiological changes may cause distinct metabolic effects associated with the fasting period biologically regulated by the species in question (Bastrop et al, 1991). Non-compensation is characterized by not presenting compensatory responses in the refeeding period after the end of the food restriction period (Ali et al, 2003)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.