Abstract

There are barriers to in-depth memory-based dietary assessment techniques in community-based research. Food pattern modeling may be an alternative method to traditional assessment techniques. The objective of this study was to pilot a comparison of food pattern modeling to 24 h diet recalls for predicting hematological outcomes of iron status. Data from 3–24 h dietary recalls in 27 women were analyzed by two methods: mean dietary intake estimates or food pattern modeling. Food pattern modeling was used to determine the total inventory of foods consumed with iron, phytate, or ascorbic acid or iron–phytate ratios. Each variable was analyzed for its relationship to hemoglobin, ferritin, and acute iron absorption from a meal challenge study by creating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. There were no differences in ROC curves or diagnostic accuracies between food pattern modeling or mean dietary intake estimates for iron, vitamin C, phytate, or phytate–iron ratios for estimating hemoglobin or ferritin values (p > 0.05). Food pattern modeling was inferior to mean dietary estimates for acute iron absorption, suggesting that more detailed methods may be necessary for studies with sensitive or acute dietary measurement outcomes. Food pattern modeling for total iron, vitamin C, phytate, and phytate–iron ratios may be comparable to detailed memory-based recalls for larger studies assessing the impact of foods on iron status.

Highlights

  • Criticisms of memory-based dietary assessment methods have spurred conversation about the context from which a diet assessment is made

  • The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of food pattern modeling to 24 h diet recall methods for predicting hematological indices of iron status

  • A sample size was calculated using a paired equivalence test for hemoglobin, ferritin, or acute iron absorption differences of

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Criticisms of memory-based dietary assessment methods have spurred conversation about the context from which a diet assessment is made. The “gold-standard” for this approach would be multiple-pass 24 h diet recalls taken on several days. Limitations to this method include detail-based memory fault, reporter bias, difficulty obtaining repeated measure recalls, and difficulty obtaining direct histories from patients and participants. These barriers make the process of highly detailed dietary recall assessment methods difficult in some areas of population-based research, in programs that need frequent monitoring for nutrient-based intervention

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call