Abstract

BackgroundAvailability and accessibility of nutritious foods can vary according to the food outlets present within a neighbourhood or community. There is increasing evidence that community food environments influence food choice, diet and the risk of diet-related chronic disease, however contemporary community food environments assessments (e.g. unhealthy fast food outlets versus healthy supermarkets or fruit and vegetable shops) may be too simplistic to accurately summarise the complexities of their impacts on food choice. This study protocol describes the development of the Food Outlets Dietary Risk (FODR) assessment tool for use by local government in Perth, Western Australia.MethodsSimilar to food safety risk assessment, the FODR assessment tool rates the potential harmful public health nutrition impact of food outlets by identifying and characterising the issues, and assessing the risk of exposure. Scores are attributed to six public health nutrition attributes: 1) availability of nutrient-poor foods; 2) availability of nutritious foods; 3) acceptability and appeal; 4) accessibility; 5) type of business operation; and 6) complex food outlet considerations. Food retail outlets are then classified as having a low, medium, high or very high dietary risk based on their total score.DiscussionA local government administered tool to rate the public health nutrition risk of food outlets requires data which can be collected during routine assessments or sourced from the internet. The ongoing categorical classification of foods available within food outlets as either unhealthy or nutritious will require nutrition scientists’ input. An objective risk assessment of the dietary impact of food retail outlets can guide local government planning, policies and interventions to create supportive community food environments. It is intended that locally relevant data can be sourced throughout Australia and in other countries to apply the local context to the FODR assessment tool. Utility and acceptability of the tool will be tested, and consultation with environmental health officers and public health practitioners will inform future iterations.

Highlights

  • Availability and accessibility of nutritious foods can vary according to the food outlets present within a neighbourhood or community

  • The Food Outlets Dietary Risk (FODR) assessment tool was developed to assist Local government authority (LGA) within the East Metropolitan Health Service (EMHS) area to identify food outlets that have a high or very risk to public health nutrition, by replicating the approach recommended by the Western Australia (WA) Department of Health for food safety risk assessment

  • Classification of available foods according to the recommendations of the Australian Dietary Guidelines requires nutrition or dietetics expertise, and it is not practical to advise environmental health officers to assess all products in each food outlet to determine the proportions of discretionary and nutritious foods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Availability and accessibility of nutritious foods can vary according to the food outlets present within a neighbourhood or community. There is increasing evidence that community food environments influence food choice, diet and the risk of diet-related chronic disease, contemporary community food environments assessments (e.g. unhealthy fast food outlets versus healthy supermarkets or fruit and vegetable shops) may be too simplistic to accurately summarise the complexities of their impacts on food choice. The availability and accessibility of healthy food is an important contributor to healthy diets [4], and varies according to the food outlets present within a neighbourhood or community [3]. Community food environments assessment has mainly focused on identifying and mapping a limited number of food outlet types using supermarkets or greengrocers as a proxy for healthy food access, and fast food or takeaway outlets as a proxy for unhealthy food access [8, 9]. Existing classification and measurement approaches may be too simplistic to accurately summarise the complexities of food outlet impacts on food choice [13]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call