Abstract

Food-niche relationships of diurnal raptors have been claimed to be shaped by either competitive interactions or opportunistic feeding. We confront these alternatives by analyzing the patterns of prey use of five assemblages of falconiforms. Our results show that food-niche breadth is not a species property but is determined by the food resources locally available; neither does it become narrower in larger assemblages nor is it correlated with raptor size. Food-niche overlaps are frequently very high and do not become smaller in larger assemblages. Mean weight of prey taken is positively correlated with raptor weight within assemblages, but varies widely across assemblages, with a single species showing manyfold differences. Weight ratios between raptors contiguous in the size axis fall well below the 2.2–3.4 expected figures, nor are they negatively correlated with the amount of food-niche overlap. Normalized distance ratios (d/w) of spacing between raptors along the food-size axis are usually smaller than the expected 1. The five assemblages are organized in feeding guilds whose size is larger where fewer prey categories are available per raptor species. In most cases we found little support for predictions based on competition-structured assemblages. This is probably because of the opportunistic feeding behavior of raptors, and perhaps also because food might not be a limiting resource for them.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call