Abstract

Food insecurity—defined as limited or unpredictable access to nutritionally adequate food—is associated with higher body mass in humans and birds. It is widely assumed that food insecurity-induced fattening is caused by increased food consumption, but there is little evidence supporting this in any species. We developed a novel technology for measuring foraging, food intake and body mass in small groups of aviary-housed European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Across four exploratory experiments, we demonstrate that birds responded to 1–2 weeks of food insecurity by increasing their body mass despite eating less. Food-insecure birds therefore increased their energetic efficiency, calculated as the body mass maintained per unit of food consumed. Mass gain was greater in birds that were lighter at baseline and in birds that faced greater competition for access to food. Whilst there was variation between experiments in mass gain and food consumption under food insecurity, energetic efficiency always increased. Bomb calorimetry of guano showed reduced energy density under food insecurity, suggesting that the energy assimilated from food increased. Behavioural observations of roosting showed inconsistent evidence for reduced physical activity under food insecurity. Increased energetic efficiency continued for 1–2 weeks after food security was reinstated, indicating an asymmetry in the speed of the response to food insecurity and the recovery from it. Future work to understand the mechanisms underlying food insecurity-induced mass gain should focus on the biological changes mediating increased energetic efficiency rather than increased energy consumption.

Highlights

  • The ‘food-insecurity-obesity paradox’ refers to the robust positive association found in humans living in Western developed countries between food insecurity—defined as limited or unpredictable access to nutritionally adequate food—and obesity (Dinour, Bergen & Yeh, 2007; Nettle, Andrews & Bateson, 2017)

  • Data were collected on 12 starlings comprising 6 males used in experiments 1–3 and 6 females used in experiment 4

  • More naturalistic system for studying foraging and mass regulation in starlings we have demonstrated that while birds gained body mass under food insecurity, replicating many previous findings, they achieved this despite eating less

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ‘food-insecurity-obesity paradox’ refers to the robust positive association found in humans living in Western developed countries between food insecurity—defined as limited or unpredictable access to nutritionally adequate food—and obesity (Dinour, Bergen & Yeh, 2007; Nettle, Andrews & Bateson, 2017). The basic argument is that when access to food is limited and unpredictable, and there is some probability of energetic shortfall, it is optimal to increase fat reserves in order to provide insurance against starvation (Lima, 1986; McNamara & Houston, 1990; Bednekoff & Houston, 1994; Higginson, McNamara & Houston, 2016; Nettle, Andrews & Bateson, 2017). While this functional argument is theoretically sound, from a mechanistic perspective it is currently unclear how either humans or birds achieve increases in body fat when access to food is limited and unpredictable (Anselme & Güntürkün, 2019; Kowaleski-Jones, Wen & Fan, 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call