Abstract

The food and feeding habits of the redbelly Tilapia (Tilapia zillii) and Guenther’s mouthbrooder (Chromidotilapia guntheri) were investigated in an abandoned gold mine reservoir at Igun from June 2013 to May 2014. Using a cast net and gill-net fishing gears, 370 fish individuals were caught and their stomach contents were analysed by using the frequency of occurrence and numerical methods. Tilapia zillii comprised 53.78% (199 individuals), while Chromidotilapia guntheri covered up the remaining percentage (46.22%) which is made up of 171 individuals. Food items in the stomachs of T. zillii individuals predominantly consisted of detritus, mud and algae (77.97%), while those in C. guntheri individuals mostly consisted fish remains, detritus and algae (81.67%). T. zillii exploited more food items (23 of 27) as compared to C. guntheri (17 of 27). The Schoener’s index value for the species was 0.65. The study showed that T. zillii and C. guntheri exhibited benthopelagic exploitation and are mainly herbivorous and omnivorous respectively based on the food items observed in the stomach contents of these species. The fish species fed on related food items as confirmed by Schoener’s overlap index (0.65), suggesting that there was overlap in the dietary requirements of the two species. This index value, however, was probably not an indication of competition for food between these two species because they exploited abundant food sources.

Highlights

  • Interactions and inter-relationships are evident among fishes of a community during their search for food

  • We examined the feeding and diet habits of the redbelly tilapia (Tilapia zillii) and Guenther’s mouthbrooder (Chromidotilapia guntheri) from the gold mine reservoir

  • T. zillii was higher in number (53.78%) than C. guntheri (46.22%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interactions and inter-relationships are evident among fishes of a community during their search for food. Some species prey on other organisms or are being preyed upon, thereby forming a food chain or web (Valeila, 1991). This signifies the transfer of energy from one trophic level to another. Diet overlap among fish species or among size classes of a single species has been calculated in several studies to help explain community structure or to clarify competitive relationships (Zaret and Rand, 1971; Keast, 1978; Wallace Jr, 1981). Overlap in the other indexes is generally considered to be biologically significant when the value exceeds 0.60

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call