Abstract

Once continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is started in a child, and the child is discharged home, follow-up needs to be organized with regular visits in order to check the tolerance and efficacy of the treatment. But there is a lack of validated clinical guidelines, mainly because of the heterogeneity of the ventilator servicing, the costs and health care systems among countries. Therefore, visits timing and strategies to monitor CPAP/NIV are not clearly defined. Moreover, depending on various factors such as the underlying disorder, the medical stability, the age of the child, and socio-economic factors, follow-up usually ranges between 1 month and 3–6 months, or even 1 year following treatment initiation, with an overnight hospital stay, an out-patient visit, a home visit, via telemonitoring or telemedicine, alone or in combination. Apart from clinical evaluation, nocturnal oximetry and capnography monitoring and/or poly(somno)graphy (P(S)G) are usually carried out during the follow-up visits to monitor the delivered pressure, leaks, residual respiratory events and synchrony between the patient and the ventilator. Built-in software data of CPAP/NIV devices can be used to assess the adherence of treatment, to monitor pressure efficiency, leaks, asynchronies, and to estimate the presence of residual respiratory events under CPAP/NIV if P(S)G is not available or in alternance with P(S)G. The possibility of CPAP/NIV weaning should be assessed on a regular basis, but no criteria for the timing and procedures have been validated. Weaning timing depends on the clinical condition that justified CPAP/NIV initiation, spontaneous improvement with growth, and the possibility and efficacy of various upper airway, maxillofacial and/or neurosurgical procedures. Weaning may be allowed in case of the disappearance of nocturnal and daytime symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) after several nights without CPAP/NIV and the objective correction of SDB on a P(S)G. But no parameters are defined. In any case, a long term follow-up is necessary to ascertain the weaning success. Large prospective studies, together with international and national guidelines, are required in order to build evidence for standardizing practice for the follow-up and weaning of CPAP/NIV in children.

Highlights

  • Children receiving home noninvasive mechanical ventilation, by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), should be followed with regular visits in order to check the tolerance and efficacy of the treatment

  • As CPAP/NIV is usually initiated in children presenting with various medical conditions with different clinical evolutions and/or potential strategies, the need to reassess the utility for this ongoing treatment is crucial, as many children may be weaned from their respiratory support

  • This review describes the available strategies based on the experience of worldwide centers or consensus papers, as evidenced-based guidelines for the follow-up and weaning of children receiving CPAP/NIV are lacking

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Children receiving home noninvasive mechanical ventilation, by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), should be followed with regular visits in order to check the tolerance and efficacy of the treatment. The review of the experience of large centers highlights the fact that not all the centers are doing PSG, and that even when possible, the sleep studies are not done on a regular basis in all patients [1] This can be explained in part by the limited accessibility to sleep centers or to the confidence in home SpO2 and CO2 monitoring and respiratory support device data. Analysis of Data Obtained From Built in Monitoring Devices Data from noninvasive respiratory support devices are widely used in clinical practice as important improvements have been made on the built-in software of CPAP/NIV devices [34, 35] Data such as adherence and effectiveness of ventilatory therapy are available, even though the type and number of available data vary according to the device [36]. Residual respiratory events and patientventilator asynchronies can be managed by adjusting the ventilator settings and reviewing the ventilator data

Major criteria
Minor criteria
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call