Follow-up after Primary Therapy: Management of the Symptomatic Patient—Surgery

Abstract

The benefit of secondary surgery in patients (pts) recurring after a negative second look is still a matter of controversy. Twenty-seven patients underwent this procedure: 5 were stage I at primary surgery and 22 stage IIIC. All 5 stage I pts had a pelvic recurrence: 3 were left with no visible tumor and were then treated with cisplatin chemotherapy. Two are alive and with no evidence of disease (NED) at 45 and 62 months. In stage IIIC pts, optimal debulking (<2 cm) was achieved in 59% (13/22), and 8 of them had no macroscopic residual tumor. All pts were then treated with cisplatin chemotherapy. Only 3 pts are still alive and NED at 56, 61, and 67 months. The most important prognostic parameters regarding secondary surgery seem to be residual tumor volume both at primary and secondary surgery, time interval between negative second-look surgery and recurrence, histology (serous) and degree of differentiation, and response to second-line chemotherapy. Finally, surgery can have a true palliative role in pts who present with bowel obstruction; in our center, most patients who had a definitive procedure did benefit from the quality of life viewpoint.