Abstract

Purposely guiding human decision making with a discrete suggestion, ‘nudging’, is increasingly popular. One particularly promising nudge is to provide decision makers with information about the decisions of others, also referred to as social information. Social information is often applied in fundraising campaigns to increase individual donations. A discrete suggestion such as the donation amount of others can result in donors donating similar amounts. We examined effects of social information in a relatively new context, namely crowdfunding. Crowdfunding is a new online fundraising tool. Our study, based on a large natural field experiment (n = 24,070), tests to what extent social information affects online donation behavior and how its effects vary throughout the duration of a campaign. We show that social information increases the individual donation amount by 17%, which is close to the average of 14% found in previous studies. However, social information did not attract more donors: the participation rate was not affected. Our study is the first to pinpoint the stage of the funding campaign at which the effect of social information is most pronounced. We found that social information is most effective in increasing donations at the beginning of crowdfunding campaigns. All materials for this article are available at https://osf.io/epuj6/.

Highlights

  • Guiding human decision making with a discrete suggestion, ‘nudging’, is increasingly popular

  • Social Information Increases Amounts Donated We hypothesized that social information increased individual donation amounts

  • We found a modestly positive effect of about 17%, which is close to the 14% found in previous studies

Read more

Summary

Methods

Study Context The data we analyzed was collected at Voordekunst, the largest crowdfunding platform in the Netherlands for cultural and arts projects, including for example dance, photography, music, theatre, movies and visual arts productions. Our treatment (Appendix A) is the addition of social information to all projects advertised on the platform with the following sentence: "Did you know that the average donation amount at Voordekunst is €82?". Convinced by Hertwig & Ortmann (2001), we used the principle of no deception, and showed website visitors in the treatment group the actual average amount donated by donors on the platform in the preceding six months. Because it was not possible to include a manipulation check after donors finalized the payment procedure on the platform, we do not know if the participants paid attention to the social information given in the treatment condition. 2,657 website visitors (11.0%) donated, 1,374 in the control group (51.7%) and 1,283 in the treatment condition (48.3%). See Appendix E for a robustness analysis where we explore the data with a model including the natural logs of the amounts donated

Results
Discussion and Conclusion
Limitations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call