Abstract
Background: Low folate status is associated with an increased risk of colorectal carcinogenesis. Optimal folate status may be genoprotective by preventing uracil misincorporation into DNA and DNA hypomethylation. Adenomatous polyps have low folate status compared with normal colonic mucosa, and they are surrounded by histologically normal mucosa that also is of low folate status.Objective: In a randomized controlled trial conducted at a single Dublin hospital between April 2002 and March 2004, we assessed the effect of folic acid supplementation on tissue folate, uracil misincorporation into DNA, and global DNA hypomethylation in colonocytes isolated from sites of adenomatous polyps and from histologically normal tissue adjacent and 10–15 cm distal to them.Methods: Twenty patients with adenomatous polyps on initial colonoscopy and polypectomy were randomly assigned to receive either 600 μg folic acid/d [n = 12, 38% men, mean age 64.3 y, and body mass index (BMI, in kg/m2) 26.6] or placebo (n = 8, 50% men, mean age 68.4 y, and BMI 27.2) for 6 mo, and then repeat the colonoscopy. Blood and colonocyte tissue folate concentrations were measured with the use of a microbiological assay. Uracil misincorporation and global DNA hypomethylation were measured in colonocytes with the use of modified comet assays.Results: Over time, folic acid supplementation, compared with placebo, increased tissue folate (mean ± SEM) from 15.6 ± 2.62 pg/105 cells to 18.1 ± 2.12 pg/105 cells (P < 0.001) and decreased the global DNA hypomethylation ratio from 1.7 ± 0.1 to 1.0 ± 0.1 (P < 0.001). The uracil misincorporation ratio decreased by 0.5 ± 0.1 for the site adjacent to the polyp over time (P = 0.05).Conclusion: A response to folic acid supplementation, which increased colonocyte folate and improved folate-related DNA biomarkers of cancer risk, was seen in the participants studied. Exploratory analysis points toward the area formerly adjacent to polyps as possibly driving the response. That these areas persist after polypectomy in the absence of folate supplementation is consistent with a potentially carcinogenic field’s causing the appearance of the polyp.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.