Abstract

It is a challenging task to investigate the different in- fluence of long-range and short-range interactions on two-state and three-state folding kinetics of protein. The networks of the 30 two-state proteins and 15 three-state proteins were constructed by complex networks analysis at three length scales: Protein Contact Networks, Long-range Interaction Networks and Short-range Interaction Networks. To uncover the relationship between structural properties and folding kinetics of the proteins, the correlations of protein network parameters with protein folding rate and topology parameters contact order were analyzed. The results show that Protein Contact Networks and Short-range Interaction Networks (for both two-state and three-state proteins) exhibit the “small-world” property and Long-range Interaction networks indicate “scale-free” behavior. Our results further indicate that all Protein Contact Networks and Short- range Interaction networks are assortative type. While some of Long-range Interaction Networks are of assortative type, the others are of disassortative type. For two-state proteins, the clustering coefficients of Short-range Interaction Networks show prominent correlation with folding rate and contact order. The assortativity coefficients of Short-range Interaction Networks also show remarkable correlation with folding rate and contact order. Similar correlations exist in Protein Contact Networks of three-state proteins. For two-state proteins, the correlation between contact order and folding rate is determined by the numbers of local contacts. Short- range interactions play a key role in determining the connecting trend among amino acids and they impact the folding rate of two-state proteins directly. For three-state proteins, the folding rate is determined by short-range and long-range interactions among residues together.

Highlights

  • The network concept is increasingly used to describe the topology and dynamics of complex systems

  • For three-state proteins, the folding rate is determined by short-range and long-range interactions among residues together

  • The three type networks (PCNs, Long-range Interaction Networks (LINs), Short-range Interaction Networks (SINs)) wereAll of Protein Contact Networks (PCNs), SINs and most LINs of three-state proteins are of assortative type

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The network concept is increasingly used to describe the topology and dynamics of complex systems. As the essential matter of life, proteins are biological macromolecules made up of a linear chain of amino acids and fold into unique three-dimensional structures (native states). A protein molecule can be treated as a complex network with each amino acid simplified as a node and the interaction between them as a link. Efforts have been made to model proteins as networks for studying protein topology, small world properties and examining the nucleation in protein folding [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Bagler and Sinha [11], in their recent protein network analysis, constructed Protein Contact Networks and Long-range Interaction Networks to analyze the assortative mixing of networks and folding kinetics of two-state proteins

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call