Abstract

In this article, we use the notion of minimal dependent sets (MDS) to introduce MDS-resolution and MDS-aberration as criteria for comparing non-orthogonal foldover designs, and discuss the ideas and their usefulness. We also develop a fast isomorphism check that uses a cyclic matrix defined on the design before it is folded over. By doing so, the speed of the check for comparing two isomorphic designs is increased relative to merely applying an isomorphism check to the foldover design. This relative difference becomes greater as the design size increases. Finally, we use the isomorphism check to obtain a catalog of minimum MDS-aberration designs for some useful n and k and discuss an algorithm for obtaining “good” larger designs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.