Abstract

BackgroundGene expression data is abundantly available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and various websites. Pathway specific analyses of gene-gene correlations across these datasets remain relatively unexplored, though they could be informative.MethodsFolate gene expression data is explored here in two ways: (1) directly, using gene-gene scatter plots and gene expression time course plots; and (2) indirectly, using de novo purine synthesis (DNPS) and de novo thymidylate synthesis (DNTS) flux predictions of a folate model perturbed by relative gene expression modulations of its Vmax parameters.ResultsPositive correlations within and between the DNPS and DNTS folate cycles are observed in the folate gene expression data. For steady state measurements across childhood leukemia patients, positive correlations between DNPS and DNTS are consistent with higher proliferative fractions requiring higher levels of both fluxes. For cells exposed to ionizing radiation, transient increases in both pathways are consistent with DNA damage driven dNTP demand, and a steadily decreasing backdrop is consistent with radiation induced cell cycle arrest. By and large, folate model based flux predictions paralleled these findings, the main differences being a gain of correlation information for the TEL-AML1 leukemia data, and the loss of one interesting inference, namely, that RNA repair driven DNPS precedes DNA repair driven DNTS after a 10 gray dose of ionizing radiation.ConclusionPathway focused correlation analyses of DNA microarray data can be informative, with or without a mathematical model. Conceptual models are essential. Mathematical model based analyses should supplement, but should not replace, direct data analyses.

Highlights

  • Gene expression data is abundantly available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and various websites

  • Using publicly available DNA microarray data, this study explores folate cycle interactions at the higher level of mRNA

  • Mathematical model of Morrison and Allegra The folate cycle model of Morrison and Allegra [1] has the following mathematical form: MTHFD2 and SHMT2, nor can it handle changes in the extra-cellular folate hydrolase gene FOLH1, so these genes were ignored in the analyses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gene expression data is abundantly available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and various websites. Pathway specific analyses of gene-gene correlations across these datasets remain relatively unexplored, though they could be informative. The folate system (Figure 1A) is central to de novo purine synthesis (DNPS) and de novo thymidylate synthesis (DNTS) and is a key target of several anti-cancer agents. Methotrexate (MTX), in its polyglutamated forms, inhibits dihydrofolate [DHF] reductase (DHFR), thymidylate synthetase (TS), glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GART), and other folate system enzymes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.