Abstract

Anogenital distance (AGD) is a biomarker for the prenatal hormonal environment. Androgen excess is a key element in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of this study was to assess the sonographic foetal AGD in a population of PCOS mothers in comparison to the general population. Foetal AGD was measured prospectively by 2D ultrasound in PCOS mothers and compared to prenatal AGD nomograms. The results were interpreted regarding maternal and foetal characteristics. The mean sonographic foetal AGD centile measurement in PCOS mothers was significantly longer in comparison to the general population (86.04% ± 18.22; p < 0.001). Estimated foetal weight and birthweight were appropriate for gestational age and did not correlate with AGD. Sonographic foetal AGD was significantly longer in PCOS diabetic mothers and in those who conceived following assisted reproduction treatments when compared to the general population (p < 0.001). Our results support the role of AGD as a biomarker of the prenatal hormonal environment and provide evidence for the hyperandrogenic effect in PCOS pregnancies on foetal androgenic status and genitalia development.

Highlights

  • The anogenital distance (AGD) is an established anthropometric androgen-dependent parameter for genital development in animals and humans and is approximately twice as long in males than in females [1,2,3]

  • Our study revealed a significantly longer sonographic foetal AGD in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) mothers’ foetuses and exemplified the role of AGD as a biomarker of prenatal androgen milieu

  • In previous studies we confirmed that the correlation between AGD and male genital malformations can be successfully demonstrated in utero and that foetal sonographic AGD can serve as a reliable proxy and estimate prenatal androgen exposure and foetal reproductive programming [24]

Read more

Summary

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Foetal Sonographic Anogenital Distance Is Longer in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Mothers. Sharon Perlman 1,2,* , Yoel Toledano 2,3, Zvi Kivilevitch 1, Nufar Halevy 1,2, Elena Rubin 1 and Yinon Gilboa 1,2. Received: 10 August 2020; Accepted: 2 September 2020; Published: 4 September 2020

Introduction
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call