Abstract

Ultrasonic neuromodulation has the unique potential to provide non-invasive control of neural activity in deep brain regions with high spatial precision and without chemical or genetic modification. However, the biomolecular and cellular mechanisms by which focused ultrasound excites mammalian neurons have remained unclear, posing significant challenges for the use of this technology in research and potential clinical applications. Here, we show that focused ultrasound excites primary murine cortical neurons in culture through a primarily mechanical mechanism mediated by specific calcium-selective mechanosensitive ion channels. The activation of these channels results in a gradual build-up of calcium, which is amplified by calcium- and voltage-gated channels, generating a burst firing response. Cavitation, temperature changes, large-scale deformation, and synaptic transmission are not required for this excitation to occur. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of specific ion channels leads to reduced responses to ultrasound, while over-expressing these channels results in stronger ultrasonic stimulation. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the effect of ultrasound on neurons to facilitate the further development of ultrasonic neuromodulation and sonogenetics as tools for neuroscience research.

Highlights

  • Ultrasonic neuromodulation has the unique potential to provide non-invasive control of neural activity in deep brain regions with high spatial precision and without chemical or genetic modification

  • Focused ultrasound (FUS) has the potential to modulate neural activity in deep-brain regions with millimeter spatial precision based on the penetrance of sound waves in bone and soft tissue

  • The neurons were placed at the top of a water tank, with a focused ultrasound transducer submerged in degassed water below them and angled to reduce standing wave formation

Read more

Summary

Results

We stimulated cells with pulsed wave (1 KHz and 1.5 KHz PRF, pulse repetition frequency) and higher frequency (670 KHz) ultrasound and found no substantial differences in response amplitude or onset delay (Supplementary Fig. 1) Based on these results, we set our subsequent stimulation parameters to 15 W/cm[2] and 500 ms (CW), which are similar to those used in large animal and human studies[9,11,14,15,16,17,18,19,36]. We looked for bubbles directly using an ultra-high-speed camera (5 MHz frame rate), and saw no bubbles formed in the vicinity of neurons during FUS application

Bursting action potentials
Discussion
Methods
Code availability
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call