Abstract
Abstract: Thirty-seven student journals (17 pretest, 17 posttest) for a group counseling and psychotherapy class were rated and analyzed on the extent to which descriptions of seven observed group dynamics for T-group sessions showed adequacy of reporting and growth. Analyses included interrater reliability, pretest–posttest differences, and qualitative theme analyses. Results from both the quantitative and qualitative analyses showed growth in recognizing the dynamics for external observations, internal experiencing, and the impacts on the group.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
