Abstract
Abstract: Thirty-seven student journals (17 pretest, 17 posttest) for a group counseling and psychotherapy class were rated and analyzed on the extent to which descriptions of seven observed group dynamics for T-group sessions showed adequacy of reporting and growth. Analyses included interrater reliability, pretest–posttest differences, and qualitative theme analyses. Results from both the quantitative and qualitative analyses showed growth in recognizing the dynamics for external observations, internal experiencing, and the impacts on the group.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
